Blog

The Override Addiction: Why Agencies Overpay Leaders Who Underperform

Why Agencies Overpay Leaders Who Underperform

Principal Lisa noticed a troubling pattern. Every time a new agent joined Team Alpha, they’d be gone within six months. Yet, she was still paying Team Alpha’s leader a 15% override on all their transactions. She was effectively rewarding him for running a revolving door.

This is the reality of override addiction—a financial trap where agencies overpay leaders who have stopped leading.

The Logic Behind Overrides

Overrides were designed as a leverage tool. Instead of one principal managing 50 agents directly, team leaders carry part of the load. In return, they receive a slice of their downline’s commissions—commonly 5% to 20%.

Done right, overrides incentivize leaders to:

But too often, agencies end up paying for titles, not results.

The Problem: Paying for Titles, Not Results

Why Agencies Get Addicted

The Real Cost of Override Addiction

Override addiction isn’t just about wasted money. It creates deeper damage:

Breaking the Cycle: Smarter Override Structures

Quick Self-Assessment for Principals

Ask yourself:

Final Word: Pay for Value, Not for Titles

Overrides can be powerful when leaders genuinely drive growth. But when agencies get addicted to paying for underperformance, overrides turn into a financial black hole.

The cure isn’t to kill overrides—it’s to tie them to real value: recruitment, retention, coaching, and culture. Because the question isn’t “Who has the title?” but “Who is building the business?”