Blog

Salary vs. Commission: Achieving Corporate Quality Without the Fixed Cost Trap

salary-vs-commission-achieving-corporate-quality-without-the-fixed-cost-trap

ListingMine Academy | Financial Modeling & Operational Excellence

Every Agency Boss is trapped between two bad choices.

Choice A (The Salary Model): You hire staff to ensure quality. You get control, but you carry a heavy fixed cost. If sales drop, you bleed cash.
Choice B (The Commission Model): You hire agents to avoid fixed costs. You survive the downturns, but you lose control. Data is messy, listings are unverified, and your brand suffers.

For years, the industry believed:
“If you want Corporate Quality, you must pay a Salary.”
This is false.
The ACN system proves that you can run a 100% Commission Agency that operates with the discipline of a Salaried Corporate Firm.
Here is how the "ACN Full Commission" model gives you the best of both worlds: High Quality and Zero Risk.

1. The "Salary Trap" (Why Paid Staff Get Lazy)

Let’s look at the failure of traditional MLS systems. They often hire Salaried Verifiers to check appointment letters and listing data.

The Incentive Mismatch:
The Salaried Verifier gets paid RM3,000 at the end of the month regardless of whether the deal closes.
If they miss a typo in the unit number? They get paid.
If they approve a listing with an expired appointment letter? They get paid.
If they are slow and the buyer walks away? They get paid.
There is no "Skin in the Game."
Because their income is guaranteed, their attention to detail naturally drops. You are paying a fixed cost for mediocre quality.

2. The ACN Quality Engine (Quality via Hunger)

Now, compare that to the ACN Commission Verifier.
This is an agent who takes up the "Verifier Role" for a split of the commission.

The "Skin in the Game" Difference:
If the data is wrong → The deal collapses → They earn RM0.
If the appointment letter is fake → The legal team rejects it → They earn RM0.
If they verify it perfectly → The deal closes → They get paid.

Real-World Example: The RM40,000 Save
In a recent ACN case, a Commission Verifier caught a fake owner signature on an Appointment Letter. A salaried staff member might have missed it because they were rushing to go home at 5 PM.
The Commission Verifier caught it because if that deal exploded later, they would lose their RM2,000 cut. By catching it early, they saved the deal—and the agency’s RM40,000 commission.

The Philosophy:
The greatest quality control is not a Manager shouting.
It is the fear of earning zero.

3. Why Traditional Commission Agents Failed Before

You might ask: “If commission drives quality, why were my old agents so messy?”
Answer: Because they were overwhelmed.
In the traditional model, a commission agent had to do Everything (List, View, Call, Close, Verify).
When you are rushing to a viewing, you don't have time to verify data perfectly.
When you are negotiating, you don't have time to take HDR photos.
Traditional Commission = Chaos.
ACN Commission = Systematic Focus.
Under ACN, the agent is still on commission, but they are Specialized.
The "Visual Specialist" is paid a % solely to take great photos. If the photos are ugly, no one clicks, and they earn nothing.
So, they take amazing photos. Without a salary.

4. The Financial Holy Grail: Corporate Benefits, Zero Risk

This is the ultimate advantage for the Agency Boss. You get the benefits of a "Staff" workforce without the bankruptcy risk of a "Salary" payroll.

Scenario A: The Salaried Staff Model
You hire 5 Admin/Verifiers @ RM3,000/month.
Fixed Cost: RM15,000/month (RM180,000/year).
Risk: If the market crashes and sales stop, you still lose RM15,000 every month. You bleed to death.

Scenario B: The ACN Commission Model
You have 50 agents picking up "Admin/Verifier" roles in the system.
Fixed Cost: RM0.
Cost of Sales: You only pay them a cut after the money comes in.
Risk: If the market crashes and sales stop, your expense is RM0. You survive.
You get the Discipline of Staff without the Burden of Payroll.

Summary: The Culture Shift

ACN allows you to have your cake and eat it too.

Feature Salaried Staff Traditional Commission ACN Commission
Cost Structure High Fixed Cost Low Fixed Cost Zero Fixed Cost
Quality Control Medium
(No Incentive)
Low
(Too Busy)
High
(Skin in the Game)
Data Integrity Good Poor Excellent
Motivation "Clock in, Clock out" "Eat what you kill" "Do it right or earn zero"

The Conclusion:
Do not burden your agency with salaries just to get quality.
Build a System.
When you use ACN, the "Commission" acts as the ultimate quality assurance manager.

Avoid the salary trap. Let the system manage the quality.

Page 1 of 1